Automated Content Review

Manual editing is time-consuming and often inconsistent. This automation runs content through multiple AI reviewers, each focusing on different aspects of quality, then synthesizes their feedback into actionable improvements.

🎯 Objective

Create an automated system that processes draft content through multiple specialized AI reviewers, checking for style, clarity, reader engagement, and technical accuracy while maintaining your organization's voice.

⚙️ The Basic Workflow

1. Draft Ingestion (Make.com)

• Monitor shared Google Docs

• Watch email attachments

• Process uploaded files

• Track CMS draft submissions

• Handle Word documents

2. Multi-Stage Review

Stage 1: Technical Review

• Grammar and spelling

• Style guide compliance

• Technical accuracy

• Formatting consistency

Stage 2: Readability Analysis

• Reading level check

• Sentence complexity

• Paragraph structure

• Transition quality

Stage 3: Reader Simulation

• Target audience perspective

• Clarity of message

• Engagement factors

• Question identification

Stage 4: Final Polish

• Voice consistency

• Flow improvements

• Call-to-action strength

• Overall impact

3. Feedback Synthesis

• Combine reviewer insights

• Prioritize changes

• Highlight conflicts

• Suggest improvements

4. Document Return

• Create annotated version

• Add revision suggestions

• Provide summary report

• Flag items for human review

🛠️ Tools Needed

• Make.com (workflow automation)

• Multiple AI instances (different roles)

• Document handling system

• Style guide database

• Notification system

📝 Sample Make.com Workflow

1. Trigger: New document submitted

2. Convert to working format

3. Run technical review

4. Process readability

5. Simulate reader response

6. Generate final recommendations

7. Return annotated document

🚀 Customization Options

• Add specialized reviewers

• Customize style guidelines

• Modify audience personas

• Adjust review depth

• Create topic-specific checks

⚠️ Keep in Mind

• Maintain human oversight

• Regular style guide updates

• Calibrate AI reviewers

• Monitor consistency

• Balance automation with judgment

🔍 Example AI Prompts

CopyTechnical Review:
Review this content for:
1. Style guide compliance
2. Technical accuracy
3. Formatting consistency
4. Citation format
Provide specific corrections and explanations.

Reader Simulation:
You are [target persona]. Reading this content:
1. What questions do you have?
2. Which parts are unclear?
3. What's most/least compelling?
4. What would make you take action?
Provide feedback as this specific reader would.

📈 Measuring Success

Track:

• Processing time reduction

• Consistency improvements

• Error catch rate

• User satisfaction

• Final content quality

Start with one type of content and a basic review process. Add stages and complexity as you validate the workflow's effectiveness.